CARE-NFL-PRO-v2.0 · Draft Research Instrument · Demo Mode

BeaconCR Intelligence Layer

Turn Patient and Caregiver Reports into Structured Real-World Evidence

BeaconCR Intelligence Layer helps research teams capture longitudinal patient-reported and caregiver-reported outcomes, score symptom burden across clinical domains, detect cross-domain research patterns, and export structured data for observational registries, compassionate-use programs, and sponsor-facing RWE reports.

Research workflow only. Not for diagnosis, treatment decisions, emergency use, or clinical decision-making.

Instrument Development Framework

Mission

To create structured research instruments that capture patient, caregiver, and clinician observations in a way that can support observational studies, compassionate-use programs, longitudinal registries, and real-world evidence generation.

Hypothesis

Longitudinal patient-reported and caregiver-reported symptom patterns can help research teams identify treatment-response signals, functional trajectories, safety observations, and quality-of-life changes across neurological injury and neuroinflammatory populations.

Intended Use

CARE-NFL-PRO-v2.0 is intended for research data collection, observational registry tracking, compassionate-use follow-up, and exploratory real-world evidence analysis. It is not intended for diagnosis, treatment selection, emergency triage, or clinical decision-making.

Current Development Status

Draft research instrument. Version 2.0. Demo mode. Not yet validated. Designed for stakeholder review, cognitive testing, caregiver feedback, clinician advisory review, and future psychometric validation.

Concept Framework

SymptomsDomainsScoresPatternsOutcomesRWE Reports

BeaconCR maps individual symptom responses into clinical research domains. Domain averages are converted into severity bands, ranked by burden, analyzed for cross-domain patterns, and exported into structured research data for longitudinal follow-up and sponsor-facing reports.

The 8 CARE-NFL-PRO-v2.0 Domains

Cognition

Memory, attention, processing speed, and executive function as reported by the patient or caregiver.

Examples

Short-term memory lapses · Difficulty concentrating · Slowed thinking · Word-finding difficulty

Score 0–10→ Domain burden score

Neurological Symptoms

Sensorimotor and neurological symptom burden including headache, dizziness, and motor control.

Examples

Headache · Dizziness / balance · Tremor or spasticity · Numbness or tingling

Score 0–10→ Domain burden score

Sleep

Sleep onset, maintenance, quality, and daytime impact.

Examples

Trouble falling asleep · Night waking · Unrefreshing sleep · Daytime sleepiness

Score 0–10→ Domain burden score

Mood / Emotional Health

Emotional wellbeing, anxiety, low mood, and irritability.

Examples

Low mood · Anxiety · Irritability · Emotional lability

Score 0–10→ Domain burden score

Functional Status

Activities of daily living, mobility, and independence.

Examples

Dressing / bathing · Mobility · Household tasks · Need for assistance

Score 0–10→ Domain burden score

Quality of Life

Overall wellbeing, participation, and satisfaction with daily life.

Examples

Participation in activities · Social engagement · Overall wellbeing · Life satisfaction

Score 0–10→ Domain burden score

Caregiver Observations

Changes observed by a caregiver, including burden and observed function.

Examples

Observed confusion · Observed mood change · Care demands · Caregiver strain

Score 0–10→ Domain burden score

Treatment Response

Perceived response to current therapy and tolerability (research observation only).

Examples

Perceived benefit · Tolerability · Symptom change since last visit · Side-effect burden

Score 0–10→ Domain burden score

Instrument Governance

Version History

Every instrument version is documented with date, rationale, question changes, scoring changes, and reviewer notes.

Question Suggestion Portal

Patients, caregivers, clinicians, and research advisors may suggest new questions or flag unclear wording for future review.

Instrument Change Log

All revisions are tracked to preserve research integrity, auditability, and version-specific interpretation of longitudinal data.

Research Advisory Board

BeaconCR may maintain a research advisory group of clinicians, caregivers, patients, statisticians, regulatory advisors, and disease-area experts to review instrument development.

Validation Roadmap

The BeaconCR Intelligence Layer is currently a research workflow prototype. Before use as a validated outcome instrument, BeaconCR should complete a staged validation pathway.

  1. 1

    Stage 1Concept Elicitation

    Collect input from patients, caregivers, clinicians, and disease-area experts to confirm that the instrument captures meaningful symptoms and functional changes.

  2. 2

    Stage 2Cognitive Interviews

    Test whether respondents understand the questions, response scales, recall periods, and domain wording as intended.

  3. 3

    Stage 3Content Validity Review

    Document whether the selected domains and questions adequately reflect the lived experience of the target population.

  4. 4

    Stage 4Pilot Registry Deployment

    Use the instrument in a limited observational registry or demo cohort to evaluate completion rates, missing data, usability, and caregiver burden.

  5. 5

    Stage 5Psychometric Evaluation

    Assess reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, known-groups validity, responsiveness to change, and minimally important difference estimates.

  6. 6

    Stage 6Longitudinal RWE Integration

    Integrate validated or fit-for-purpose measures into BeaconCR registry workflows, sponsor reports, and publication-ready datasets.

BeaconCR Intelligence Layer is an exploratory research workflow and draft PRO/ObsRO analytics prototype. It is not currently a validated clinical outcome assessment, not intended to support labeling claims, and not intended to replace validated disease-specific instruments. Any use in regulated research, product development, or labeling-supportive studies requires appropriate protocol design, IRB review, statistical analysis planning, and clinical outcome assessment validation strategy.

AI-assisted summaries are generated from structured response data and are intended only as research drafting aids. They must be reviewed by qualified study personnel before use in research reports, sponsor communications, regulatory summaries, or clinical documentation.

Intranasal CNS Research

Designed for Intranasal CNS Research Workflows

BeaconCR Intelligence Layer can support observational follow-up for intranasal CNS programs, including neurological injury, neuroinflammation, TBI, post-concussion symptoms, HIE, cerebral palsy, and neurodegenerative research pathways.

For Kurve-related programs, the Intelligence Layer may help structure baseline and follow-up symptom reporting, caregiver observations, treatment-response narratives, safety observations, and longitudinal RWE summaries.

BeaconCR does not claim that any investigational therapy, device, biologic, exosome product, cell therapy, or intranasal intervention is safe or effective unless supported by appropriate clinical evidence and regulatory authorization.

Why This Matters

Many innovative physicians, caregivers, and sponsors observe meaningful patient changes that are never captured in a structured way. BeaconCR Intelligence Layer helps convert those observations into research-grade longitudinal data, allowing teams to track symptom burden, functional change, quality-of-life impact, caregiver observations, and treatment-response signals over time.

For Physicians

Add structured outcomes tracking to physician-led registries without building research infrastructure from scratch.

For Sponsors

Support real-world evidence generation with consistent PRO capture, structured exports, and longitudinal summaries.

For Patients and Caregivers

Give patient and caregiver observations a structured pathway into research data while preserving appropriate medical and ethical oversight.